Skip to content

Politics

Court Nullifies Atiku Abubakar’s 2027 Presidential Ticket, Throws ADC Campaign into Uncertainty

The Federal High Court ruling invalidates the David Mark-led ADC leadership and decisions taken under it, including Atiku’s presidential nomination, as the opposition party prepares to challenge the judgment.

By RahmahPublished · 4 min read
Court Nullifies Atiku Abubakar’s 2027 Presidential Ticket, Throws ADC Campaign into Uncertainty

Nigeria’s political landscape has witnessed another major development ahead of the 2027 general elections after a Federal High Court in Abuja nullified the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) led by former Senate President David Mark, invalidating the process that produced former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar as the party’s presidential candidate.

The judgment, delivered on Thursday, November 5, by Justice Peter Lifu, declared the Mark-led caretaker committee illegally constituted and set aside decisions taken under its leadership, including the emergence of Atiku as the party’s presidential flag bearer.

The ruling followed a suit filed by Nafiu Bala Gombe, a former ADC Deputy National Chairman for the North-East, who challenged the process through which Mark and other members of the caretaker committee assumed control of the party.

Why the court nullified the ADC leadership

The dispute originated from the leadership transition that followed the resignation of the party’s former National Chairman, Ralph Nwosu, in 2025.

Following his resignation, David Mark emerged as the leader of a new national leadership structure, with former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola becoming National Secretary.

However, Gombe challenged the legitimacy of the arrangement, arguing that he was constitutionally entitled to assume leadership following Nwosu’s departure.

He subsequently approached the court, seeking to invalidate the actions of the Mark-led leadership.

In its ruling, the court held that the process through which the leadership emerged violated provisions of the ADC constitution, the Electoral Act and the 1999 Constitution.

Justice Lifu also directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) not to recognise or act on decisions taken at the party’s 99th National Executive Committee meeting held on July 27, 2025.

The judgment further affected the party’s other nominations for elective positions ahead of the 2027 elections.

Atiku rejects the ruling as ADC promises appeal

Reacting to the development, Atiku Abubakar rejected the judgment and vowed to challenge it at the Court of Appeal.

The former Vice-President alleged that the ruling was part of an attempt to weaken the opposition and frustrate his presidential ambition.

His reaction came barely a day after he officially launched his presidential campaign in Sokoto State, where he presented his political agenda ahead of the January 2027 elections.

Despite the ruling, Atiku maintained that his campaign would continue, insisting that Nigerians deserved an alternative to the current administration.

The ADC also rejected the judgment, describing it as an attempt to undermine opposition politics and restrict Nigerians’ ability to choose their preferred leaders.

The party’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, questioned the timing of the ruling, noting that it came shortly after the party’s campaign activities gained momentum.

The party further argued that an earlier judgment by another Federal High Court judge had recognised the Mark-led leadership, raising questions about the relationship between the two judicial decisions.

It announced that it would challenge the latest ruling through available legal channels.

What the ruling means for the 2027 elections

The judgment introduces fresh uncertainty into the ADC’s preparations for the 2027 general elections.

Beyond Atiku’s presidential nomination, the court’s decision also affected the party’s national officers and candidates nominated under the Mark-led leadership.

If the ruling remains in force following the appeal process, the party could face significant difficulties participating in the elections through the leadership structure and nominations it previously submitted to INEC.

However, the judgment is not necessarily the final determination of the dispute, as the ADC has announced plans to pursue further legal action.

The legal battle also places INEC in a difficult position regarding the recognition of party leadership and candidates as the electoral process progresses.

The development comes at a time when Nigeria’s opposition parties are attempting to build a stronger political coalition ahead of the 2027 elections.

The ADC had emerged as an important platform for opposition figures seeking to challenge the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), with prominent politicians, including Atiku Abubakar, David Mark and other former political officeholders, aligning with the party.

Consequently, the leadership dispute has implications beyond an internal disagreement. It raises questions about the ability of opposition parties to maintain organisational stability, resolve internal conflicts and present credible alternatives during elections.

For Nigerian voters, the situation also highlights the influence of internal party structures and judicial decisions on the choices available during an electoral process.

As the ADC prepares to challenge the judgment, attention will turn to the appellate courts and INEC’s response to the ruling.

Whether Atiku’s presidential ambition can survive the legal challenge remains uncertain, but the development has already introduced another significant hurdle into Nigeria’s preparations for the 2027 general elections.

Follow AfriView

Don’t Miss the Next Big Story

Enjoyed this story? Stay connected with AfriView for the latest breaking news, trending stories and important updates from Nigeria, Africa and around the world.

Explore Trending Stories

Newsletter

Subscribe to News Updates

News updates from AfriView. Unsubscribe at any time.

Related stories